Monday, October 28, 2019
Looking At The Rocking Horse Winner Essay
Looking At The Rocking Horse Winner Essay Growing up in a capitalist society and living with his mother who showed no affection were only a few of the tasks David Herbert Lawrence mentions in his story The Rocking-Horse Winner. Did these negative aspects influence him or did they break him? We are sure of one thing: the characters included in this short story symbolize and show relation to the life of this particular author. The nostalgia for a mothers love and acceptance was what brought this story to its peak of interest through the character of Paul, a child. For example, Lawrence states, That [when] you fight is only a sign that you want in yourself, the child knows that; your own soul is deficient, so it fights for the love of the child( qtd. in Davies 124). Lawrences tragic and obsessive relationship with his mother led to neglect, along with money-dominated capitalism which he presents in his story The Rocking-Horse Winner, and Lawrence enforces the harmful impact that money can have on a family household. Lawrence uses a wide description of irony in The Rocking-Horse Winner. For instance, Lawrences wondrous feeling towards Pauls prediction of horse races and making money is dampened by Hester being ungrateful and wanting more money. The author furthers a sorrowful resolution for the cause of Pauls death. Furthermore, tragic irony is used in this story when Paul predicted so many winning horses, but ended up losing his life in the end of the story. Furthermore, Pauls death of course makes the story a tragic one; but just as tragic is the death of innocence and love, symbolized by Paul, in his unfortunate mother (Koban 396). In addition, situational irony occurs when we as the readers thought the outcome of the story will end with Paul and his family being affluent, but they end up with a loss that could not be brought back. Furthermore, another problem that Lawrence portrayed in The Rocking-Horse Winner is that capitalism dominates within the society. On the other hand, Lawrence links The Nature and Logic of Capitalism written by Robert L. Heilbroner in The Rocking-Horse Winner. Heilbroners view of capitalism is that, Capital is not a material thing but a process that uses material things as moments in its continuously dynamic existence (qtd. in Watkins 296). Capitalism initiated the obsession, tragedy, and neglect money caused within the household. For instance, The desire for money pervades the home, the withdrawal of the child into his private fantasy world (Watkins 296), and also the power relations of a capitalistic society. D.H. Lawrences use of capitalism within The Rocking-Horse Winner is portrayed through the characters in his story: [Paul] is a laborer for his mother, to whom he gives all of his money, only to find that the more he gives the more she needs (Watkins 297). To sum up, the capital istic society that Lawrence was brought up in as a young child and how it causes financial burdens is applied within this story. In addition, money was the powerful force which cause Hester to become such an greedy and ungrateful soul. For example, money is an issue with Hester because she tried to live on a social scale that she couldnt afford to be on. As a result, There must be more money! (Lawrence 366) signifies the insecurity that Paul and his sisters experience due to the withered love between Hester and her husband. Money, on the other hand, must be kept in perspective and not romanticized into a substitute for love, as it is in The Rocking-Horse Winner. Money initiates obsession and neglect; for example, Hester shows more significance and love for materialistic objects than showing it for her own children. Furthermore, Lawrence used his personal relationship with Lady Cynthia Asquith to influence the role of Hester in The Rocking-Horse Winner. Asquith was a longtime friend of Lawrence and influenced his stories: Biographical materials will show the striking similarities between the Asquith family and the family in the story (Davies 123). For instance, Lady Cynthia lost her capacity to love her son, although she struggled not to do so (Davies 125). In addition, Lawrence also changed the age and sex of the children; Lady Cynthia had three boys, in which Hester having two girls and one boy instead There were a boy and two little girls (Lawrence 365). Moreover, it was the poor social and personal situations in Lady Cynthias life including the other associates that D.H. Lawrence met in England that influenced the blatant and blithe moral in The Rocking-Horse Winner. Through the life influences of D.H. Lawrence comparison to The Rocking-Horse Winner, from growing up in a money-dominated society and dealing with a neglectful mother, Lawrence portrays his life through Paul. Lawrences childhood as an unloved young man and his own personal fantasies are portrayed in a short story in which riding the horse is what the author had in his possession, but the magnificent supernatural gifts were not present in reality. These supernatural gifts were given to the character Paul. Lastly, the contemporary life situations of D.H. Lawrences life gave The Rocking-Horse Winner morality, theme, and most of all the tragic events that money can bring.
Friday, October 25, 2019
How Clarice Influenced Montag in Fahrenheit 451 Essay examples -- Ray
Guy Montag is a fireman who is greatly influenced in Ray Bradbury's novel, Fahrenheit 451. The job of a fireman in this futuristic society is to burn down houses with books in them. Montag has always enjoyed his job, that is until Clarisse McClellan comes along. Clarisse is seventeen and crazy. At least, this is what her uncle, whom she gets many of her ideas about the world from, describes her as. Clarisse and Montag befriend each other quickly, and Clarisse's impact on Montag is enormous. Clarisse comes into Montag's life, and immediately begins to question his relationship with his wife, his career, and his happiness. Also, Clarisse shows Montag how to appreciate the simple things in life. She teaches him to care about other people and their feelings. By the end of the novel, we can see that Montag is forever changed by Clarisse. Montag never appreciated the simple things in life. He would never walk or drive slow enough to see the colors of things. This bothered Clarisse McClellan very much. She loved to catch raindrops on her tongue, and she always left little presents for Montag to make sure he appreciated these simple things. Through her spirit and her small simple presents, Montag finds the strength to also appreciate these things.ââ¬Å"And then very slowly as he walked, he tilted his head back in the rain for just a few moments and opened his mouth..â⬠(Bradbury 24). Montag begins to see that no matter how hard life gets, he will always have these smaller things that he can enjoy. In the beginning of the novel, Montag thinks he cares about everyone and their feelings. Once Clarisse steps into his life, this changes right away. She shows him that the world he lives in ignores people's feelings .They make games out of kill... ... chin. She tells Montag that this means she is in love. When she rubs the dandelion underneath Montag's chin she has a very different result. There is no powder. ââ¬Å"'What a shame,' she said. 'You're not in love with anyone' 'I am very much in love!' He tried to conjure up a face to fit the words, but there was no face 'I am!'â⬠Montag goes home, and thinks about this. He later realizes that he isn't in love, and would not care if Mildred died. Montag is influenced by Clarisse a lot. And, her impact on him is tremendous. She questions his whole life, teaches him to appreciate the simple things, and to care about other people and their feelings. ââ¬Å"You're peculiar, you're aggravating, yet you're easy to forgive..â⬠(Bradbury 23) Through all Clarisse's questioning, Montag knows that she is trying to help him. Because of her help and impact on him, Montag is changed forever.
Thursday, October 24, 2019
This Is My Playes Last Scene
How has Donne used characteristics typical of metaphysical poetry to convey his ideas in ââ¬Å"Holy Sonnet: ââ¬ËThis is my playes last sceneââ¬â¢? â⬠This is my playes last scene is one of Donneââ¬â¢s ââ¬ËHoly Sonnetsââ¬â¢ embodying spiritual pain and struggling faith in Christianity. Numerous biblical allusions and morbid tone that are typical of metaphysical poetry, convey Donneââ¬â¢s fear of death and religious scepticism. The opening four lines depict the last moments of the speakerââ¬â¢s life through metaphoric comparisons. The comparison ââ¬Å"playes last sceneâ⬠suggests the speaker is searching for an end that is meaningful and fulfilling.Christian imagery in ââ¬Å"pilgrimageââ¬â¢s last mileâ⬠places this envisioned end in religious context, as a pilgrimage to the site of treasured holy relics is representative of Donneââ¬â¢s path to unfaltering devotion, to God. A paradoxical phrase ââ¬Ëidly, yet quickly runââ¬â¢ expresses t he speakerââ¬â¢s hesitance on the way to achieving this believed end to life. The addition of the comparisons ââ¬Å"spanââ¬â¢s last inchâ⬠and ââ¬Å"minuteââ¬â¢s latest pointâ⬠enhances the cumulative listing of comparisons and dramatises the speakerââ¬â¢s fear of death.The startling personification ââ¬Å"gluttonous deathâ⬠portrays Donneââ¬â¢s morbid paranoia of the brief moment when body and soul become ââ¬Å"unjointâ⬠. The speakerââ¬â¢s life is dichotomised; his body shall ââ¬Å"sleep a spaceâ⬠, his soul shall ââ¬Å"see that faceâ⬠, a Christian image of Godââ¬â¢s omnipotence imparting judgement on the speaker. The ninth line witnesses a direct confidence in the speakerââ¬â¢s tone ââ¬Å"as my soul, to heaven her first seatâ⬠. More prominently featured ââ¬Å"So, fall my sinsâ⬠, the immutable tone conveys a false reassurance, whereby the speaker actually pleas helplessly for Godââ¬â¢s will and judgement.The i mperative voice in ââ¬Å"Impute me righteousâ⬠forcefully channels the personaââ¬â¢s imploration to receive Godââ¬â¢s judgement and have so-called righteousness imputed. The precise word ââ¬Å"imputeâ⬠makes another religious reference to the Christian understanding of attributing unearned qualities in an act of grace. The finality of the sonnet is epitomised by the poetic triplet ââ¬Å"the world, the flesh and devilâ⬠, which alludes to the three sinful temptations as it was known in the context of Donneââ¬â¢s time.It enhances the prayer made by the speaker to be purged of sinful thoughts and acts, by godly intervention that would finally allow him to reach a transcendental state. Ultimately, Donne questions the Christian faith, and commands Godââ¬â¢s mercy and judgement by Christian imagery and references to Biblical passages. He expresses despair about his salvation, and reveals his fear of death in a sensitive meditation. As such, the poem is an exem plary display of typical metaphysical characteristics.
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
Julius Caesar â⬠Qualities of a Good Leader Essay
Selecting a good leader for a country is like dominoes. The leader needs to be somebody that wonââ¬â¢t make the occasional mistake that would, in dominoes, hit one of the others and make them all fall down. If the leader does their job correctly, the country will be strong. A good leader must be able to make his own decisions because if he cannot, he will be considered a weak leader. A countryââ¬â¢s leader must be able to communicate with the people as well because if he gets the people of the country to listen, then his job would be much easier. Also, if the leader were noble to his countrymen, then there would not be any disputes within the country. In Julius Caesar, Mark Antony is a perfect example of a good leader. Not only is he a confident and noble person, he is also persuasive and that helps in becoming a good leader. Antony would be a good leader of Rome because he is confident, noble, and persuasive. He never changes his mind when he makes a decision and that is good in a leader. When the triumvirate was making a list of people to kill, Antony came across the name of his nephew. Even though it was his nephew that he was killing, Antony said, ââ¬Å"He shall not live; look, with a spot I damn him.â⬠(IV.i.9) Antony had to kill his nephew, who might oppose him, and he did not want to take the chance. Another part where Antonyââ¬â¢s confidence in decision-making was when he was talking to Octavius about Lepidus. The triumvirate was made up of three people, Antony, Lepidus, and Octavius, and so ââ¬Å"The threefold world divided, he should stand / One of the three to share it? (IV.i.14-15) Antony meant that Lepidus would not be capable of ruling a third of the world, and that he would rather take half and Octavius take the other half. Antonyââ¬â¢s confidence shows him being capable of being a great leader. Along with being confident, Antony would make a great leader because of his nobility towards others. Antony was seen to be noble towards Caesar. The two men were close to each other like a mother and her child. When Caesar died, Antony wanted revenge for Caesar. And Caesarââ¬â¢s spirit, ranging for revenge, ââ¬Å"With Ate by his side come hot from hell / Shall stir these confines with a monarchââ¬â¢s voice / Cry ââ¬Å"Havoc!â⬠and let slip the dogs of war / That this foul deed shall smell above the earth / With carrion men, groaning for burial. (III.i.270-275) Caesar was like family to Antony and when Caesar was killed,à Antony wanted Caesarââ¬â¢s spirit to rest easier, and so he went to get revenge for Caesar. Besides being noble to Caesar, Antony was noble to the countrymen as well. When Antony came to give his speech about Caesar at the town, the people were listening to him respectively. Antony knew about Caesarââ¬â¢s will and he did not have to tell the citizens about it. Since Antony was a good person he read the will and he said ââ¬Å"To every Roman citizen he gives, / To every several man, seventy-five drachmas.â⬠(III.ii.244-245) Being a good person as he is, he read the will as the people wanted so they would be content. Antonyââ¬â¢s nobility shows him to be worthy in becoming a good leader of Rome. Along with being confident and noble, Antony would be a great leader because he can be persuasive. Since Antony had great speaking skills, he could get people to think the way he wants them to think. After Caesarââ¬â¢s death, Antony met up with the conspirators and he decided to make them think he would forget about the assassination. He said, ââ¬Å"I doubt not of your wisdom. / Let each man render me his bloody hand.â⬠(III.i.202-203) The conspirators thought that Antony had forgiven them, but the truth was that Antony was going to make the public turn against Brutus and the conspirators. When it was time for Antony to make his speech about Caesar to the countrymen, he used his speaking skills and got the countrymen on his side. The citizens were moved by his speech and said, ââ¬Å"Weââ¬â¢ll hear him, weââ¬â¢ll follow him, weââ¬â¢ll die with him.â⬠(III.ii.211) The countrymen were listening to Brutusââ¬â¢ words at the beginning and they were agreeing with what he said. Now Antony had gotten the people to listen to him and follow him. Antony uses his speech skills to win the heart of the crowd and he makes the people feel how he wants them to. He said, ââ¬Å"Good friends, sweet friends, let me not stir you up / To such a sudden flood of mutiny.â⬠(III.ii.12-13) That quote probably made the crowd want to know more of what Antony had to say, and that was what Antony wanted. So, the ability to persuade people is a very important element in being a good leader. A successful country must have a good leader, and Antony has the ability of being a great leader. He can persuade people into thinking as he does and he is noble to the people of the country. He gives the people an opportunity to say what they have toà say instead of just going on his own beliefs. He is also very confident in himself and so whatever he decides to do he does, and does not change his mind. Not only is he noble to his friends, he is also noble to the people of the country as well. With Antony as a leader, the country would not go bad since he is a person who does thing right. Mark Antony was an honorable and powerful man, and so he would be a great leader.
Tuesday, October 22, 2019
Does Evolution explain human nature
Does Evolution explain human nature Morality is one principle that applies in both human beings and animals alike especially considering the evolution theory. Morality covers a broad perspective made of several elements/virtues like empathy. In their work, Martin Nowak and Frans de Waal address the issue of empathy in relation to human evolution. Of the two scientists, Martin Nowak addresses the issue of empathy better in relation to human evolution.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Does Evolution explain human nature? specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Nowakââ¬â¢s explanation of empathy fits well in evolution. Elementary, evolution is based on natural selection, which in turn is based on competition. Therefore, if humans have evolved through competition and survival for the best, it means that there has to be a change of rules to contain competition prevalent in natural selection to accommodate empathy. Empathy calls for cooperation, which is non-exi stence in competition; therefore, ââ¬Å"Cooperation means that one individual pays a cost for another individual to receive a benefitâ⬠(Nowak 12). This explains how empathy fits in this selfish nature of evolution as facilitated by natural selection. The rules change when the ââ¬Ëcostââ¬â¢ for another individual is fully paid. There has to be mechanisms therefore, to facilitate paying this cost. To this Nowak posits, ââ¬Å"The fundamental mechanisms encouraging cooperation are direct and indirect reciprocityâ⬠(Nowak 12). Direct reciprocity results from interaction of two same individuals; what one individual has done to the other, determines how the other individual will treat the former. On the other hand, indirect reciprocity insinuates that what an individual has done to others, will determine how she/he will be treated. This means that, even in presence of competition, two competing sides may have empathy towards each other and cooperate. This is why Nowak says that, ââ¬Å"Cooperationâ⬠¦is another, fundamental force of evolutionâ⬠(13). Therefore, just like natural selection, cooperation becomes part of evolution bringing in the element of empathy existing amidst competing and evolving beings. Frans de Waal on his side views empathy from a perspective that does not withhold the competing nature of natural selection that brings about evolution. According to Waal, ââ¬Å"Human morality must be quite a bit older than religion and civilization. It may in fact, be older than humanity itselfâ⬠(12). This argument may be true; however, it does not address the issue of competitive nature of evolution. It excludes the issue of survival for the fittest. Advertising Looking for essay on anthropology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More While the principle cardinal rule of doing unto others as you wish them to do to you may hold true, it fails to explain how basic compo nents of evolution apply. Waal argues that, ââ¬Å"Other primates live in highly structured cooperative groups in which rules and inhibitions apply and mutual aid is a daily occurrenceâ⬠(12). The only thing he fails to address here is how these cooperative groups come to be in a scenario where everyone is competing to survive. He holds that empathy and reciprocity support human morality; however, the big question remains, how does empathy prevail in competition grounds. Looking at the two works of these scientists, Nowak seems to explain empathy better in relation to evolution. Without changing core principles of evolution like natural selection, empathy could only occur at a cost but not based on morality. Nowak exposits the process of paying the cost through reciprocity adding that cooperation is a basic element of evolution. Along evolution, competing individuals learn to empathize with those who empathize with them, hence cooperating in the process. Waalââ¬â¢s argumen t that human morality preceded humanity itself does not address the issue of competition in evolution. Nowak, Martin. ââ¬Å"Does Evolution Explain Human Nature?â⬠John Templeton Foundation. N.d. Web. www.templeton.org/evolution/Essays/Nowak.pdf Waal, Frans. ââ¬Å"Does Evolution Explain Human Nature?â⬠John Templeton Foundation. N.d. Web. www.templeton.org/evolution/Essays/deWaal.pdf
Monday, October 21, 2019
Internet Regulations essays
Internet Regulations essays Internet is the most used tools for research nowadays, it is the haighway of informations which connects and communicates the world in seconds, it is a place in which you can fin every kind of information of almost any topic that you are interested in, even tough I realize that internet is an invaluable tool, i believe that some regulations should be made in order to make it a safer place for every people who surfs on the web. A big issue that has been on the news lately is the children pornography, children pornography is a reality on the web and some acti9on must be taken in order to protect our kids from the inherent danger that a place without laws can be. Every internet user has seen the so called "pop-up" windows; these windows are, most of the time, not requested, for example, in 10 websites I found 6 "pop-up" windows. While many of those windows are just marketing or adds, there are also some pornographic adds, which are opened without your consent, the webpages wich i visited are aimed to the general public, and not to a particular audience, these pages can be viewed by anyone with access to the net, and these users includes children. Is for this reason that i believe that there should be some regulations on the internet, I am not saying that every webpage should be blocked, but that the web pages that are displayed should not contain morally wrond content, I believe that some regulations cound en with this problem and our society, particularly our kids, would be safer while surfing the net. ...
Sunday, October 20, 2019
Which SAT Score Do Colleges Use
Which SAT Score Do Colleges Use SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Standardized test scores are an important component of the college application process. However, since most people take the SAT multiple times, it's not always clear which scores colleges will look at when judging an applicant's potential. In this article, I'll give you an overview of which SAT scores colleges use in the admissions process. The Basics When colleges look at your SAT scores, they will usually consider your composite score more strongly than the scores from individual sections.Some more specialized tech and engineering schools (think a school like MIT) will be interested to know what your Math scores are because these schools place a high value on quantitative reasoning abilities.However, they will still look at your composite score to make sure that your overall academic abilities will allow you to keep up in college. Schools may use different scores to judge your application based on what you decide to send them and what their individual score policies are.Some schools require SAT scores but use Superscoring and allow Score Choice, some schools ask that you send all of your SAT scores, and some schools donââ¬â¢t require you to submit the SAT at all.Iââ¬â¢ll discuss the various possible scenarios in the next two sections. Score Choice and Superscoring Score Choice and Superscoring are two policies that will affect which scores colleges look at when evaluating your performance on the SAT.Score Choice is under your control; you can decide whether or not to send your scores from each test date to colleges.If you choose to send scores from just one test date, those are the only scores that a college will look at in judging your application. With Score Choice, you're only allowed to send full score reports.You canââ¬â¢t, for example, send your Math score from one test date and your Reading and Writing scores from another date.Score Choice is a good option if you performed particularly poorly on one test date and donââ¬â¢t want to advertise it to colleges.If you donââ¬â¢t use Score Choice when sending SAT scores to colleges, they will look at all of your test scores. In many cases, colleges will use a process called Superscoring to make judgments about your scores as a whole.Superscoring is when colleges combine your best score from each section on the SAT across different tests to create your best possible composite score. Say you took the SAT twice. The first time you got a 700 on Critical Reading, a 650 on Math, and a 710 on Writing, and the second time you got a 670 on Critical Reading, a 700 on Math, and a 750 on Writing.A college that uses Superscoring would take the 700 on Critical Reading, the 700 on Math, and the 750 on Writing and combine them into your best possible composite score of a 2150 rather than using the slightly lower composite scores of 2060 and 2120 from the two individual test sessions.See this article for a list of colleges that Superscore the SAT. In general, even if they donââ¬â¢t use Superscoring, most schools will look at your highest scores.Colleges donââ¬â¢t want students to get too stressed out about any one test date.Taking the highest score also means that colleges can boost their score statistics and improve their reputations, so itââ¬â¢s a win-win. Colleges will usually only look at the tip of your metaphorical SAT iceberg. What About the New SAT? With the arrival of the new SAT, there's another issue to consider: How will colleges view the new scores, and will they superscore between the old and new versions of the test if you submit both? The consensus is that colleges will NOT superscore between the two different versions of the test. The changes are too significant for superscoring between tests to be a valid method of assessing scores. You will be able to submit scores from both the old and new SAT (at least for the time being), but each set of scores will be viewed completely separately. Exceptions and Special Cases There are some exceptions to these general rules about which scores colleges consider.Some schools only look at Critical Reading and Math scores and donââ¬â¢t care about Writing scores (including the essay).There are a couple reasons why they might do this. Since the Writing section was only added in 2005, it doesnââ¬â¢t have as much data as Critical Reading and Math to back it up in terms of how accurately it predicts success in college. The Critical Reading and Math sections are given more weight because many colleges believe that a studentââ¬â¢s level of college preparedness can be determined by looking at the scores for these sections alone.Critical Reading and Math scores are often used as benchmarks to determine whether a student should place out of introductory classes during their freshman year. Other schools donââ¬â¢t require you to submit scores at all!These ââ¬Å"test optionalâ⬠schools wonââ¬â¢t look at any of your scores unless you decide to submit them. More and more schools have decided to loosen their standardized testing requirements based on these testsââ¬â¢ limited predictive value of success in college academics.These colleges want to give students a choice about how they present themselves in their applications.If a student feels that their test scores are not representative of their academic ability, then they may choose not to submit them.If you do submit your scores, you can expect these colleges to consider them just like schools that explicitly require SAT scores. Some schools are also ââ¬Å"test flexible.â⬠This means that they do require you to submit test scores in some form, but they don't have to be from the SAT or ACT.NYU, for example, will allow students to submit three AP test scores or three SAT Subject Test scores in lieu of the regular SAT or ACT.These policies vary from school to school, but they cater to students who want to demonstrate mastery in an academic area that's not explicitly covered by the regular SAT. There is only one college, Hampshire College, that is currently "test blind."This means that they won't look at any of your test scores in judging your application. DON'T SHOW ME YOUR SCORES! DON'T YOU KNOW I'M TEST BLIND Conclusion Most colleges will only see the scores that you want them to see.Through Score Choice and Superscoring, the vast majority of schools give you the option of sending just your best scores, or they will formulate your best possible score based on your performance across different test dates. For the most part, colleges are only looking at your best composite SAT score or a composite score that represents a combination of your best scores on each section of the test. You can submit both old and new SAT scores for the time being, but colleges won't superscore between the two versions of the test. Some schools donââ¬â¢t require you to submit the SAT or will only look at certain sections of the test. You should check the websites of the colleges that interest you to see whether they might have special policies towards test scores. With these types of schools, you have even more choice as to how you present yourself on your application. You can decide to leave your scores out of the equation completely. Which SAT score colleges use to judge applicants depends on the policies of each institution, but most schools that explicitly require you to send in your SAT results will use your highest scores. What's Next? Now that you know which scores colleges use in the admissions process, you can set a score goal for yourself. Read our article on what a good SAT score might mean for you. If you're currently working on improving your SAT scores, take a look at this list of quick tips that will help you adjust your strategy appropriately. The most important part of this whole process is sending in the score reports. Read more about how to send your SAT scores to collegesand whether you should send the four free SAT score reportsthat you get with each test. Want to learn more about the SAT but tired of reading blog articles? Then you'll love our free, SAT prep livestreams. Designed and led by PrepScholar SAT experts, these live video events are a great resource for students and parents looking to learn more about the SAT and SAT prep. Click on the button below to register for one of our livestreams today!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)